Diaphragmatic Breathing vs Regular Breathing: A Coach's Take for Athletes

When a Cross-Country Runner Hit the Wall: Alex's Story

Alex was a junior on the high school cross-country team. Halfway through the season he stopped improving. In workouts he felt fine, but during races his pace collapsed at mile three. His coach told him to "relax and breathe," which sounded helpful but produced little change. Meanwhile his teammates praised breathing tips they heard online: breathe through the nose, match cadence to strides, or "just take deep breaths." None of those fixed the problem.

One night after a particularly rough race Alex sat in the locker room gasping. He described heavy shoulders, tight upper chest, and feeling like he couldn't get air despite breathing fast. The coach, who'd coached at the collegiate level, watched the pattern and said something simple: "You're breathing with your chest. We're going to teach your diaphragm how to do its job." That remark began a four-week experiment that produced measurable improvements in recovery between intervals and steadier pace during races. As it turned out, the change was not magic - it was methodical practice.

The Hidden Cost of Shallow Breathing for Athletes

Shallow, upper-chest breathing is normal when you're stressed. It gets air to your lungs quickly, but it wastes energy and reduces efficiency. For athletes the costs show up as:

    Faster onset of breathlessness during sustained efforts. Poor diaphragmatic engagement that raises resting heart rate and slows recovery. Increased tension in neck and shoulders that compromises posture and running economy. Less effective oxygen delivery and carbon dioxide clearance at submaximal efforts.

Think about a 10k where you need to hold hard effort. If you're taking shallow, rapid breaths you may be ventilating more but not moving more oxygen into working muscle. This leads to a mismatch between perceived effort and actual output. For athletes who chase marginal gains, this mismatch can cost seconds per mile and reduce the quality of training sessions.

What "regular breathing" usually means

When I say "regular breathing" here, I mean default, habitual breathing many athletes use without cueing - often clavicular or thoracic. It's fast and shallow under load, and it tends to be reactive rather than controlled. Diaphragmatic breathing, by contrast, uses a large, dome-shaped muscle beneath the lungs to pull air deeper with each breath.

Why Common Breathing Cues Often Fail on the Field

Coaches are great at quick cues: "Relax," "Breathe," "Stay tall." Those can help in the short term. But they fail for a few reasons:

    They don't teach how to recruit the diaphragm. Telling someone to "breathe deep" rarely changes muscular patterning. They ignore context. Breathing that helps during a sprint differs from what you want for a long run or during strength training. They assume skill transfer. A runner might breathe well lying down but revert to shallow patterns under race stress.

Take a common drill: put a hand on the belly and one on the chest and tell the athlete to make the belly rise. Many athletes can do that lying on the back. This leads coaches to assume the athlete is ready. As it turned out, the diaphragm often needs progressive Homepage loading to make the pattern automatic under fatigue.

This led to the mistake of thinking that vagal tone or heart rate variability would instantly improve from one session. Real change needs repetition and context-specific practice. Simple cueing without progressions tends to produce short-lived gains.

Why breathing apps and trendy tips fall short

Apps can pace you, and trends push interesting ideas like nasal-only breathing during easy runs. Those tools are useful, but they are not substitutes for teaching the motor skill. Apps don't feel how your ribs move or whether your shoulders tense. They also rarely teach how to integrate breathing into anaerobic intervals, where most races are decided.

How One Coach Reinvented Practice with Diaphragmatic Breathing

The coach in Alex's case used a staged approach to make diaphragmatic breathing practical. It was simple, direct, and skeptical of flashy promises. The steps were:

Restore basic patterning off the field - lying down and seated drills. Add mild loading - standing and light jogging while holding the pattern. Contextualize - integrate into intervals, starts, and the first 200 meters of race pace. Measure and adjust - use perceived exertion, interval recovery times, and race splits.

As it turned out, the first step was the hardest for some athletes. The coach gave a task that sounded almost too basic: spend ten minutes a day for a week breathing with a soft balloon or a hand on the belly while lying on the back. The objective wasn't dramatic; it was consistent neural rehearsal to teach the brain where the diaphragm felt and how the belly should move.

The coach added practical cues that worked in sport settings. Rather than "fill your belly," the cue became "soft belly, strong exhale." That wording helped athletes relax the neck while actively pushing air out. This specific exhale activation is crucial - it closes the loop by training the diaphragm to return to its dome and prepare for the next breath. This led to faster, more controlled breaths under load rather than bigger, uncontrolled gulps of air.

Core drills the coach used

    Supine belly breathing with a 1 kg sandbag on the abdomen - 10 minutes daily. Seated 4-6 patterned breathing: inhale 3 seconds, hold 1 second, exhale 4 seconds - 5 sets of 8 breaths. Walking integration: maintain diaphragmatic pattern for 5 minutes of easy walking. Interval carryover: during rest periods between repeats, focus on slow full exhale and belly reset (30 seconds).

These drills moved from low-load to sport-specific. The coach resisted the temptation to force nasal-only breathing for all athletes. Instead he tested and found nasal breathing helped aerobic base runs but limited ventilatory capacity in intervals for some athletes. He didn't dogmatically apply one method to all. That pragmatic approach produced better buy-in and measurable improvements.

From Panic to Pacing: Real Results for Teams and Individuals

After four weeks Alex's results were clear. His interval recovery times improved - he recovered to target heart rate faster between 800m repeats. In races he sustained a steadier pace and his perceived effort at race pace dropped. We tracked three metrics:

Perceived exertion at a steady race pace (on a 1-10 scale) decreased by about one point. Average recovery heart rate after intervals improved by 6-10 beats per minute. Race splits tightened - fewer late-race slowdowns.

Those are modest but meaningful gains. For a competitive runner they translated to seconds saved per mile, which can be the difference between making a collegiate roster and not. For team sports the benefits showed up differently - better composure during stoppages, reduced shoulder tension that improved throwing mechanics, or better shot accuracy late in a game because of steadier breath control.

Thought experiment: the 30-second sprint

Imagine two athletes performing a 30-second all-out sprint then resting for 90 seconds, repeated six times. Athlete A uses shallow, fast breaths between sprints. Athlete B practices diaphragmatic exhales during the rest and focuses on clearing CO2 efficiently. Which one comes back quicker for the next sprint?

Most coaches who have tried this say Athlete B tends to be ready sooner. That readiness isn't mysterious. A full exhale clears more CO2 and sets up a deeper subsequent inhale, allowing better oxygen uptake. Meanwhile shallow breathing prolongs sympathetic arousal and keeps heart rate higher between efforts.

image

How to measure progress practically

You don't need lab tests. Use these field measures:

    Interval recovery heart rate (how many beats drop in 60 seconds). Perceived exertion at a given pace. Consistency of splits across reps or race sections. Objective metrics if available - average pace, distance covered in sets, or HRV for recovery trends.
Aspect Chest/Throat Breathing Diaphragmatic Breathing Efficiency Lower - more shallow, less tidal volume Higher - deeper breaths, better exchange Recovery Slower Faster Body Tension Higher - neck/shoulder tightness Lower - easier posture control Skill Transfer Poor under stress Good with progressive training

Practical Session Plan for Coaches

Here's a sample 20-minute add-on you can use twice a week for three weeks to build diaphragmatic skill and transfer it to sport.

Warm-up 5 minutes easy movement. Supine patterning 6 minutes: place hands on abdomen, slow inhale 3s, exhale 4s. 3 sets with 30 seconds rest. Standing integration 4 minutes: walk and maintain pattern, focus on soft shoulders. Interval carryover 5 minutes: during rest between short repeats do a focused exhale and belly reset (30 seconds after each repeat). Debrief 30 seconds: athletes rate ease of breathing and tension on scale 1-10.

Consistency matters more than duration. Ten minutes daily of patterning will outperform one 60-minute session if the athlete never practices the skill again.

Final Notes - What Works and What Doesn't

What works: progressive motor learning, context-specific practice, simple cues that emphasize exhale control, and measurement based on recovery and perceived exertion. What doesn't work: single-session fixes, wholesale application of trendy methods without testing, and assuming an athlete will transfer a supine skill to a race automatically.

As a coach, be direct: show the movement, give a practical cue like "soft belly, strong exhale," and force the pattern into the moments that matter - starts, transitions, rest intervals. Admit the limits: diaphragmatic breathing won't replace interval training, strength work, or tactical skill. It will, however, reduce wasted effort, lower unnecessary tension, and give athletes a tool they can use in pressure moments.

So cut to the chase with your athletes. Spend a little time teaching the diaphragm how to work. Practice it where it counts. This led to steadier pacing for Alex and better recovery for his team. If you're skeptical, run the simple 30-second sprint thought experiment with your squad. The results are usually persuasive.

image